Power Up!
After growing up in the generation first taught using
PowerPoint, it was very interesting to read an article talking about the
program’s potential from 14 years ago. At
the time, PowerPoint must have seemed like a great and creative new way to “jazz
up” lectures. However, the main problem
with PowerPoint is just that: it is
still used primarily to lecture. I read
through the possible classroom uses listed in this article, and the only
activity listed that included student engagement beyond lecturing was the Jeopardy
Game. I think the biggest failing of
PowerPoint is that it is too easy to be used as a crutch: teachers believe that adding color and
graphics is enough to make a lecture interesting and engaging for
students. The author of this article
often mentions how pictures and sound effects “capture students’ attention,”
but our generation is constantly being bombarded with pictures and videos and
sounds- adding a few to the same old lecture is not going to go very far.
On the other hand, PowerPoint can be very helpful if it is
one tool in a teacher’s entire “toolbox.”
This article mentioned using PowerPoint to help students who are nervous
speaking in front of the class give presentations. When used correctly, this can be a comfort,
providing a small barrier between the presenter and the class. The lights dim and the presenter does not
need to make eye contact with the audience because everyone is looking up at
the pictures. This does help students
who are shy about public speaking.
There was, however, a statement made by the author that I
believe is not at all true: “PowerPoint
also can help address other learning styles, such as the auditory, visual
kinesthetic, and manipulative.” Presentations
with pictures and graphs may be more useful to visual learners, but I cannot
imagine a way to use PowerPoint to teach manipulative learning styles, and this
was never addressed. A SmartBoard could
be used in this way (moving words and images around on the screen), but not a
regular PowerPoint presentation.